The doctrine of collateral estoppel can assist parties facing costly litigation. Robert Berezin and Carmen Bremer consider how it can be invoked in patent disputes Collateral estoppel can be used to ...
The New York Court of Appeals rarely grants motions to reargue its decisions. But in a recent case, Auqui v. Seven Thirty One Partnership, 22 N.Y.3d 246 (2013), it did just that, and unanimously ...
Collateral estoppel, or issue preclusion, the Court of Appeals found, "precludes a party from relitigating in a subsequent action or proceeding an issue clearly raised in a prior action or proceeding ...
Jim Brogan, Brian Eutermoser and Janna Fischer discuss the ways that the unsuccessful IPR petitioner at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board still can challenge validity in subsequent district court ...
The Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in Trump v. CASA may have clipped the wings of universal injunctions, but it left open — and almost surely elevated — the role of an obscure but fundamental doctrine ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback